Asian Soil Research Journal

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Accepted Papers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Reprints
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving Policy
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Submission
  • Testimonials
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2022 - Volume 6 [Issue 2]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Soil Compaction Effects on Soil Physical Properties and Soybean (Glycine max.) Yield in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria

  • E. A. Ewetola
  • O. E. Onofua
  • E. I. Babatunde

Asian Soil Research Journal, Page 47-56
DOI: 10.9734/asrj/2022/v6i230129
Published: 2 June 2022

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


Compaction is one of the major threats to soil sustainability as it can have negative effects on soil physical properties. Therefore, field experiments were conducted at Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching and Research Farm, Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria, in 2015 and 2016 to evaluate the influence of soil compaction on selected soil physical properties, growth, yield and nutrient uptake of soybean (Glycine max.). The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. There were four treatments which consisted of 0 (no pass of tractor wheel), 4, 8, and 14 passes of tractor wheel totaling 16 treatments. Soil physical properties determined were; bulk density, total porosity, macroporosity and saturated hydraulic conductivity. While data recorded on soybean were plant height, stem girth, number of leaves, biomass and grain yield. Data collected were subjected to Analysis of Variance and significant means were compared using Least Significant Difference at 5% level of probability. Although not significant, soil physical quality decreased with increased levels of soil compaction in both years of study. Growth of soybean was significantly reduced by soil compaction with 14 passes producing the shortest plant (91.46, 29.10 cm) compared to the control (103.96, 30.27 cm), respectively, for 2015 and 2016. Grain yield of soybean significantly decreased by 12, 27, and 44% respectively, for 4, 8 and 18 passes of tractor wheel. The study indicates that soil compaction as a result of tractor wheel passes should be minimized on agricultural fields to reduce the adverse effects on soil physical properties, soybean growth and yield.


Keywords:
  • Soil compaction
  • physical properties
  • soybean yield
  • nutrient uptake
  • Full Article - PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Ewetola, E. A., Onofua, O. E., & Babatunde, E. I. (2022). Soil Compaction Effects on Soil Physical Properties and Soybean (Glycine max.) Yield in Ogbomoso, Southwestern Nigeria. Asian Soil Research Journal, 6(2), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.9734/asrj/2022/v6i230129
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Abagale FK. Effect of agricultural machinery on physical and hydraulic properties of agricultural soils. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manag. 2021;12(2):58–66. DOI: 10.5897/jssem2021.0876.

Keller T, Sandin M, Colombi T, Horn R, Or D. Historical increase in agricultural machinery weights enhanced soil stress levels and adversely affected soil functioning. Soil Tillage Res. 2019;194: 104293. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104293.

Okinda FW, Nyakach S, Nyaanga DM. Effect of tractor wheel traffic on selected soil physical properties. J. Eng. Agric. Environ. 2021;7(2):28–39. DOI: 10.37017/jeae-volume7-no2.2021-3.

Augustin K, Kuhwald M, Brunotte J, Duttmann R. Wheel load and wheel pass frequency as indicators for soil compaction risk: A four-year analysis of traffic intensity at field scale. Geosciences. 2020;10(8): 292. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences10080292.

Ungureanu N, Vlăduţ V, Cujbescu D. Soil compaction under the wheel of a sprayer. E3S Web Conf. 2019;112:03027. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911203027.

Singh K, Mishra SK, Singh HP, Singh A, Chaudhary OP. Improved soil physical properties and cotton root parameters under sub-soiling enhance yield of Cotton-Wheat cropping system. Data Br. 2019;24: 103888.

Ferreira CJB, Tormena CA, Severiano EDC, Zotarelli L, Betioli Júnior E. Soil compaction influences soil physical quality and soybean yield under long-term no-tillage. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2021;67(3): 383–396. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1733535.

Mašek J, Chyba J, Kumhálová J, Novák P, Jasinskas A. Effect of soil tillage technologies on soil properties in long term evaluation. In TAE 2016 - Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Trends in Agricultural Engineering 2016. 2016-Septe, no. September, 391–397.

Schjønning P, Lamandé M, Crétin V, Nielsen JA. Upper subsoil pore characteristics and functions as affected by field traffic and freeze--thaw and dry-- wet treatments. Soil Res. 2016;55(3):234–244.

Sivarajan S, Maharlooei M, Bajwa SG, Nowatzki J. Impact of soil compaction due to wheel traffic on corn and soybean growth, development and yield. Soil Tillage Res. 2018;175:234–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2017.09.001.

Nouri A, Lee J, Yin X, Tyler DD, Jagadamma S, Arelli P. Soil physical properties and soybean yield as influenced by long-term tillage systems and cover cropping in the midsouth USA. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):1–15. DOI: 10.3390/su10124696.

Tolon-Becerra A, Tourn M, Botta GF, Lastra-Bravo X. Effects of different tillage regimes on soil compaction, maize (Zea mays L.) seedling emergence and yields in the eastern Argentinean Pampas region. Soil Tillage Res. 2011;117:184–190.

USDA, National soil survey handbook. Title 430-VI, Part 647. Washington, DC: Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Government Printing Office; 1996.

Blake GR, Hartge KH. “Bulk Density, Methods Soil Anal. Part 1—Physical Mineral. Methods. 1986;363–375.

Flint LE, Flint AL. “2.3 Porosity” in Methods of soil analysis, Part. 2002;4:241–254.

Klute A, Dirksen C. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. Methods soil Anal. Part 1—physical Mineral. Methods. 1986;687–734.

Shah AN, et al. Soil compaction effects on soil health and cropproductivity: an overview. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24(11):10056–10067. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8421-y.

Siczek A, Horn R, Lipiec J, Usowicz B, Łukowski M. Effects of soil deformation and surface mulching on soil physical properties and soybean response related to weather conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2015;153:175–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.06.006.

Mossadeghi‐Björklund M, Jarvis N, Larsbo M, Forkman J, Keller T. Effects of compaction on soil hydraulic properties, penetration resistance and water flow patterns at the soil profile scale. Soil Use Manag. 2019;35(3):367–377. DOI: 10.1111/sum.12481.

Elaoud A, Chehaibi S. Soil compaction due to tractor traffic. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2011; 11(5):539–545. DOI: 10.1007/s11668-011-9479-3.

Allen RR, Musick JT. Furrow irrigation infiltration with multiple traffic and increased axle mass. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1997;13(1):49–53.

Mossadeghi-Björklund M, et al. Effects of subsoil compaction on hydraulic properties and preferential flow in a Swedish clay soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2016; 156:91–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.09.013.

Boizard H, et al. Using a morphological approach to evaluate the effect of traffic and weather conditions on the structure of a loamy soil in reduced tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 2013;127:34–44.

Koch HJ, Heuer H, Tomanová O, Märländer B. Cumulative effect of annually repeated passes of heavy agricultural machinery on soil structural properties and sugar beet yield under two tillage systems. Soil Tillage Res. 2008;101(1–2): 69–77.

Nakano K, Miyazaki T. Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of compacted subsoils using the non-similar media concept. Soil Tillage Res. 2005; 84(2):145–153.

Schwen A, et al. Hydraulic properties and the water-conducting porosity as affected by subsurface compaction using tension infiltrometers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2011; 75(3):822–831. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0257.

Zhang S, Grip H, Lövdahl L. Effect of soil compaction on hydraulic properties of two loess soils in China. Soil Tillage Res. 2006;90(1–2):117–125.

Obour PB, Ugarte CM. A meta-analysis of the impact of traffic-induced compaction on soil physical properties and grain yield. Soil Tillage Res. 2021;211: 105019. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105019.

Beutler AN, Centurion JF. Soil compaction and fertilization in soybean productivity. Sci. Agric. 2004;61(6):626–631. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-90162004000600010.

Benjamin JG, Nielsen DC, Vigil MF. Quantifying effects of soil conditions on plant growth and crop production. Geoderma. 2003;116(1–2):137–148. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00098-3.

Benjamin JG, Karlen DL. LLWR techniques for quantifying potential soil compaction consequences of crop residue removal. BioEnergy Res. 2014;7(2):468–480. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-013-9400-x.

Kahlon MS, Chawla K. Effect of tillage practices on least limiting water range in Northwest India. Int. Agrophysics. 2017; 31(2):183–194. DOI: 10.1515/intag-2016-0051.
  • Abstract View: 50 times
    PDF Download: 17 times

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, Asian Soil Research Journal. All rights reserved.