Soil Mechanical Composition and Texture as Indices for On-site and Field Precise Choice of Land Use Type to Adopt

Main Article Content

M. O. Eyong
K. I. Ofem


The soils of Agoi-Ibami in central Cross River State of Nigeria were evaluated for their mechanical and textural compositions in the field. The objective was to present to small scale, subsistence farmers, with limited access to external farm-inputs for time consuming and expensive laboratory analysis, soil data for on-site and field land use and management decisions. Three profile pits were sunk, along three well defined and selected toposequences, on three landscape elements of crest, middleslope and valley bottom in three land use types of forest (FS), rubber (RS), and arable (AS). Relevant environmental properties were inventorized and the profiles described in the moist state. Their textures were determined by the feel method in the field among other morphological properties. The field investigation showed the soils to be predominatly loamy soils. After the field investigation, soil samples were collected from the morphogenetic horizons for determination of their mechanical composition in the laboratory to supplement the field investigation. Their loamy textures and mechanical composition inferred from their loamy texture impact unique physical and chemical properties like good water holding capacity, good drainage, fertile and productive soils and good for irrigation. Loamy soils exhibit properties intermediate between sandy and clayey soils. Loamy soils are considered best for agricultural production because they hold more water and nutrients than sandy soils and have better drainage, aeration and tillage properties than clayey soils. They have slight plastic and sticky workable properties ideal for crop growth and crop productivity. Therefore knowing the texture of soils and their mechanical composition in the field their properties can be inferred and land use and management decisions can be taken on-site without recourse to expensive and time consuming laboratory analyses which are beyond the capacity of resource poor small-scale and subsistence farmers in developing countries and or sub-Saharan Africa. The land use and management decisions are taken after mutual adaptation and adjustments of the description of the land use and the increasingly known soil qualities in the field.

Sand, silt, clay, loam, soils, mechanical composition, texture, indices, land use, choice, laboratory analysis, farm inputs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Eyong, M. O., & Ofem, K. I. (2020). Soil Mechanical Composition and Texture as Indices for On-site and Field Precise Choice of Land Use Type to Adopt. Asian Soil Research Journal, 4(3), 28-43.
Original Research Article


Brady NC, Weil RR. The nature and properties of soils. India. Dorling Kindersley; 2014.

Esu IE. Soil characterization, classification and survey. Ibadan Heiman educational books, Nigeria limited; 2010.

Fairhust T. Handbook for integrated Soil Fertility Management. Africa Soil Health Consortium, Nairobi; 2012.

Eyong MO, Akpa EA. (Physic-chemical properties of soils derived from sandstone parent materials under selected land use types at Agoi-Ibamiin central Cross River State, Nigeria. World Journal News of National Sciences 2019;23:12-1.

Obi ME. Soil physics: A compendium of lectures Nsukka, Nsukka. Avanto publishers, Accra. 2000; 155-135.

Eyong MO, Okon PB. The mechanical composition, texture, specific surface area and their agronomic implications for profiles of soils developed from sandstones in Cross River State, Nigeria. World Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 2020;6(5):309-295.

Ofem KL, Asadu CLA, PI Ezeaku, Kingsly J, Eyong MO, Katerina V, Vacdav T, Karel N, Ondrej D, Vit P. Genesis and classification of soils over limestone formations in a tropical humid region. Asian Journal of Science Research. 2020; 13:243-228.

Amalu UC. Fertility management of some gleyic luvisols and alisols grown to rice in southeastern Nigeria: Boron, copper, zinc status. Proceedings of the 2ndAnnual Conference of the Soil Science Society of Nigeria. 2001;160-150.

Ekwueme BN. precambrian geology and evolution of South Eastern Nigeria basement complex Calabar, University of Calabar Press; 2003.

Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC. Soil survey staff. Field book for describing and sampling soils, version 3.0, national resources conservation service, national soil survey center. Lincoln, N. E; 2012.

Day PR. Particle fascination and particle size analyses. In c. a. black (Ed). Methods of soil analyses American society of agronomy monograph, Wisconsin, Madison. 1965;9: 69–55.

Blake GR. Bulk density inc. Black (Ed). Methods of soil analysis. American society Of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.1965; 9:390-374.

International institute for tropical agriculture (IITA).Annual report Ibadan international institute for tropical Agricgulture; 1997.

Srikanth P, Somaskhav SA, Kanthi GK. Raghu BK. Analyses of heavy metals by using atomic absorption spectroscopy from the samples taken around Visakhapatrum. International journal of environmental ecology. Family and urban stuches. 2013; 3(1):132-127.

Bremmer MJ, Mulvany CS. Methods of soil analyses. Agronomic monograph of American society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin. 1982; 9: 1178-1149.

Riley JR, Murphy J. A modified simple solution method for determination of phosphorous in natural water. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 1962;27:36-31.

Maclean EO. Soil pH. In l. A. Paige (Ed).Methods of soil analyses agronomic monograph of American society of agronomiy, Madison, Wisconsin. 1982; 9(2):224-199

Chapman HD. Cation exchange capacity in C. A. Black (Ed). Method of soil analyses. American society of Agronomy Monograph. 1965(2):901-891.

Salvalia SG, Golakiya BA, Patel SV. Textbook of soil physics: theory and practice. India. Kalyani Publishers; 2016.

Soil survey staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy.12th edition. USDA-natural resource conservation service Washington, DC, USA. 2014;360.